A. Brewaeys et al., CHILDREN FROM ANONYMOUS DONORS - AN INQUIRY INTO HOMOSEXUAL AND HETEROSEXUAL PARENTS ATTITUDES, Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology, 14, 1993, pp. 23-35
This study compared two groups of homosexual and heterosexual parents
with respect to their attitudes towards the donor-origin of their chil
dren. All couples had applied at the Fertility Clinic for artificial i
nsemination with anonymous donor sperm (AID). Both groups had used ano
nymous donors in order to conceive. However, the sexual orientation of
the parents and the presence or absence of a social father was differ
ent in the two groups. By comparing such different families it was hop
ed to obtain insight into those factors which influence parents' attit
udes concerning donor insemination. Twenty-five lesbian and 25 heteros
exual parents were interviewed. The open-ended questionnaires solicite
d information on the following issues: attitudes towards secrecy/discl
osure of the use of a donor, views on anonymity/ identity registration
of the donor, parents' cognitive and emotional representation of the
donor. Response rates differed between the groups: all homosexual pare
nts consented to the interview and 44% of the heterosexual parents did
so. Parents' attitudes depended on several variables. The different f
amily structures were related to different motivations for AID treatme
nt. For heterosexual couples, the use of a donor offered them the oppo
rtunity to become a 'normal family'. For homosexual couples, creating
a two-mother family unit meant going one step further in 'being differ
ent'. Attitudes towards the use of a donor were consequently different
: heterosexual couples chose secrecy and donor anonymity. Homosexual p
arents intended to inform their children. Of these homosexual parents,
40% would prefer the identity of the donor to be registered. This evo
lution towards removal of the anonymity seemed to be encouraged by the
openness surrounding the use of a donor itself. In both groups it rem
ained difficult to reduce the donor to an anonymous sperm cell, fantas
ies and questions about the donor continued to exist over the years.