A COMPARISON OF UV AND FLUORESCENCE DETECTORS IN THE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF GLYPHOSATE DEPOSITS AFTER POSTCOLUMN DERIVATIZATION

Citation
Kms. Sundaram et J. Curry, A COMPARISON OF UV AND FLUORESCENCE DETECTORS IN THE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF GLYPHOSATE DEPOSITS AFTER POSTCOLUMN DERIVATIZATION, Journal of liquid chromatography & related technologies, 20(4), 1997, pp. 511-524
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Analytical","Biochemical Research Methods
ISSN journal
10826076
Volume
20
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
511 - 524
Database
ISI
SICI code
1082-6076(1997)20:4<511:ACOUAF>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
A sensitive and rapid liquid chromatographic method for the analysis o f glyphosate using either post-column ninhydrin derivatization and UV detection (UV-D) or post-column reaction, fluorogenic labelling with o -phthalaldehyde in the presence of 2-mercaptoethanol and fluorescence detection (FD) is described. The sensitivity of the UV-D and two fluor escent detectors (HP-FD and Kratos-FD) were compared and evaluated to analyze glyphosate residues from glass fibre filter (GFF) discs used a s deposit collectors in aerial application. The herbicide was extracte d from the GFF discs using 30.0 mt of phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 2.1, derivatized and quantified. The method was tested initially, opti mized and validated by using glyphosate standards. The average percent recoveries from fortified GFF samples were 93.7 (UV-D), 99.2 (HP-FD) and 94.9 (Kratos-FD). The corresponding standard deviation and coeffic ient of variation (percent) were 6.0 and 6.44; 1.6 and 1.67; and 4.4 a nd 4.59, respectively. The minimum quantifiable limits (ng/50 mu L inj ection) for UV-D, HP-FD and Kratos-FD were 49, 16 and 28, respectively . The study showed that HP-FD was very sensitive compared to the other two detectors. The simplicity of the method allows high sample throug hput for the routine analysis of glyphosate deposits.