Ss. Levinson et Sg. Wagner, THE RELATIVE USEFULNESS OF AUTOMATED APOLIPOPROTEIN-A-I AND HIGH-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL ASSAYS AS MARKERS FOR CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE, American journal of clinical pathology, 101(1), 1994, pp. 104-108
Research studies have shown that apolipoprotein A-I (ape A-I) is a bet
ter marker for coronary artery disease (CAD) than high-density lipopro
tein cholesterol (HDLC). Yet, it is unclear whether assays for apolipo
protein A-I, which is part of macromolecular lipoprotein complex, can
perform as well when measured by routine automated clinical laboratory
techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare automated apolip
oprotein A-I assays with HDLC as a marker for CAD. The authors studied
two groups of of angiographically documented men, aged 44-70 years, 4
2 with CAD and 123 without CAD in an unmatched, controlled study. Stan
dard clinical laboratory techniques for assaying HDLC, and automated k
it rate immunonephelometric, end point immunonephelometric, end immuno
turbidimetric assays for apolipoprotein A-I were used. High-density li
poprotein cholesterol was a better marker than apolipoprotein A-I, acc
ording to the Mann Whitney test; HDLC also showed better diagnostic se
nsitivity, specificity, and predictive value. Using a precipitation me
thod, HDL(3) was a better marker than HDL(2), but not as good as total
HDLC. The authors concluded that HDLC remains the best routine single
CAD marker commonly available for evaluation of HDL status in a high-
risk population.