We evaluated the relation of atrial rhythm to a clinical course of tre
atment in 147 patients diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Th
irty-six of the patients (24%) had either transient (9 patients) or pe
rsistent (27 patients) atrial fibrillation (AF). Compared with DCM pat
ients with sinus rhythm (SR), the AF patients did not differ in age, l
eft ventricular (LV) dimension, fractional shortening, or hemodynamic
parameters, but the AF patients had slightly larger left atria, After
a mean follow-up of 3.8+/-2.9 years, the NYHA functional classificatio
ns in the AF patients improved in 20 of the 36 (56%), whereas those of
the SR patients improved in only 30 (27%) (p<0.01). The actuarial 5-y
ear survival rate was significantly better for AF patients than for SR
patients (93% versus 68%, p<0.05). LV function remained unchanged in
SR patients but improved significantly in AF patients, particularly in
patients with transient AF and with ''rate-controlled'' AF (those wit
h a mean heart rate of less than 90 beats/min). This study suggests th
at atrial fibrillation may result in significant LV dysfunction, which
is reversible in some cases once the arrhythmia is controlled. Aggres
sive antiarrhythmic therapy should be considered for patients initiall
y diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation.