REPRODUCTIVE AND DAMAGE POTENTIALS OF 2 POPULATIONS OF ROTYLENCHULUS-RENIFORMIS ON SWEET-POTATO AND RELATED COMPARISONS WITH MELOIDOGYNE-JAVANICA ON TOMATO
Sa. Walters et Kr. Barker, REPRODUCTIVE AND DAMAGE POTENTIALS OF 2 POPULATIONS OF ROTYLENCHULUS-RENIFORMIS ON SWEET-POTATO AND RELATED COMPARISONS WITH MELOIDOGYNE-JAVANICA ON TOMATO, Journal of nematology, 25(4), 1993, pp. 830-835
Two Rotylenchulus reniformis populations (North Carolina and Georgia)
were compared on sweetpotato and tomato. 'Beauregard' sweetpotato and
'Better Boy' and 'Marion' tomato were excellent hosts for both R. reni
formis populations. On Beauregard sweetpotato, the two populations did
not differ in fecundity; however, on both tomato cultivars, the Georg
ia population reproduced at a higher rate than the North Carolina popu
lation (P less than or equal to 0.05). Meloidogyne javanica reproducti
on was higher (P less than or equal to 0.05) on Marion than on Better
Boy. Neither population of reniform nematodes suppressed shoot growth
of tomato or sweetpotato at any Pi (initial population density). Both
populations of R. reniformis, however, restricted storage-root growth
of Beauregard sweetpotato but enhanced shoot growth. When the Georgia
population was evaluated in microplots with Pi levels of 0, 20,000, or
40,000 R. reniformis/500 cm(3) soil, total fruit weights of Better Bo
y tomato were not affected. In the greenhouse, Marion tomato fresh sho
ot and fruit growth (weights) was suppressed by M. javanica, but Bette
r Boy was not affected. Root necrosis increased linearly with Pi on Be
auregard sweetpotato grown in the greenhouse and became more pronounce
d as numbers of R. reniformis increased, regardless of the population.
The cultivars of tomatoes evaluated were tolerant to the two populati
ons of R. reniformis in a sandy soil and exhibited no root necrosis. M
arion tomato was highly susceptible to M. javanica, while Better Boy w
as tolerant.