S. Daopin et al., COMPARISON OF 2 CRYSTAL-STRUCTURES OF TGF-BETA-2 - THE ACCURACY OF REFINED PROTEIN STRUCTURES, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 50, 1994, pp. 85-92
Transforming growth factor-beta is a multifunctional cell-growth regul
ator and is a member of the TGF-beta superfamily of cytokines. Each mo
nomer is 112 amino acids long and the mature active form is a 25 kDa h
omodimer. Recently, the crystal structure of TGF-beta 2 has been deter
mined independently in two laboratories [Daopin, Piez, Ogawa and Davie
s (1992). Science, 257, 369-373; Schlunegger and Grutter (1992). Natur
e (London), 358, 430-434] and subsequently refined to higher resolutio
ns [Daopin, Li and Davies (1993). Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. In th
e press; Schlunegger and Grutter (1993). J. Mel. Biol. In the press].
A detailed structural comparison shows that the two structures are nea
rly identical with the differences mostly located on the mobile region
s of the molecule. The r.m.s. differences between the two structures a
re 0.10 Angstrom for 104 pairs of C-alpha atoms, 0.15 Angstrom for 434
pairs of main-chain atoms, 0.33 Angstrom for 860 out of 890 pairs of
protein atoms and a correlation of 90% between the temperature B facto
rs of all protein atoms. Based on a comparison of the water molecules,
a B value of 60.0 Angstrom(2) is recommended as the cut off for model
ing new waters. The structural identity is striking because in one cas
e the material was expressed in vivo in CHO cells whereas in the other
case it was expressed in E. coli and had to be refolded in vitro. The
overall coordinate errors are estimated to be 0.21 Angstrom from the
Luzzati plot, 0.18 Angstrom from the sigma (A) plot, 0.24 Angstrom wit
h Cruickshank's equations and 0.25 Angstrom using the empirical method
of Ferry and Stroud. These estimates are comparable to the r.m.s. str
ucture superposition. The r.m.s. differences correlate very well with
the crystallographic B values and the relation is best described with
the Cruickshank formula. In addition to the estimation of an overall e
rror, a new application of the Cruickshank formula is presented here t
o estimate the local errors. (C) 1994 International Union of Crystallo
graphy