Various enzymatic urinary activities have been proposed to assess rena
l proximal tubule damage in children, including neonates. Nevertheless
comprehensive knowledge on the developmental aspects of physiological
enzymuria is limited, particularly with regard to lysosomal and brush
border enzymuria. Urinary activities of two lysosomal enzymes, N-acet
yl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) and beta-galactosidase (GAL), and of t
wo brush border enzymes, alanine aminopeptidase (AAG) and gamma-glutam
yltransferase (GGT) were comparatively investigated in normal prematur
es (n = 28), term neonates (n = 52), infants aged less than 2 years (n
= 19) and children (n = 33), and compared to urinary excretion of bet
a(2)-microglobulin (B2M). Enzymatic activities were assayed using eith
er spectrophotometrical (NAG, AAP, GGT) fluorimetrical (GAL) or radioi
mmunological (B2M) methods, and were related to urinary creatinine exc
retion. Developmental profiles of both the studied lysosomal enzymes a
nd of B2M were similarly characterized with significantly decreasing v
alues from prematures (NAG 9.29 +/- 1.44, GAL 2.26 +/- 0.26 IU/mmol cr
eatinine, indicated as mean +/- SEM) to term neonates (6,94 +/- 0.58 a
nd 1.76 +/- 0.15 IU/mmol creatinine, respectively) and order infants a
nd children. Lysosomal enzymatic urinary activities correlated linearl
y with a coefficient of r = 0.75, (p < 0.05), while correlations betwe
en each lysosomal enzymatic activity and B2M urinary excretion were we
aker. Profiles of both the studied brush border enzymes were character
ized with lower activities in prematures (AAP 4.45 +/- 0.44, GGT 5.52
+/- 0.49 IU/mmol creatinine) than in term neonates (5.62 +/- 0.92 and
9.1 +/- 1.73 IU/mmol creatinine, respectively) or even in infants with
respect to GGT (AAP 4.06 +/- 0.72 and GGT 11.54 +/- 1.71 IU/mmol crea
tinine), with a consecutive decrease of activities in older infants or
children. It is concluded that lysosomal and brush border enzymuria f
ollow different developmental profiles in the normal human. Studies in
volving enzymuria as a marker of tubular lesion should include the mea
surements of at least one lysosomal and one brush border enzymatic act
ivity, and should be interpreted with reference to the respective, spe
cific developmental profiles.