Am. Batterham et al., ALLOMETRIC SCALING OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS BY BODY DIMENSIONS IN MALES AND FEMALES, Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 29(2), 1997, pp. 181-186
Physiological variables must often be scaled for body size differences
to permit meaningful comparisons between subjects or groups. This stu
dy aimed to determine the proper relationship between body dimensions
and left ventricular mass (LVM) via allometric scaling (AS) in 142 sub
jects (78 males, 64 females; ages 18-40). A cubic formula was used to
estimate LVM from wall thicknesses and left ventricular internal dimen
sions derived from M-mode echocardiography. Fat free mass (FFM) was pr
edicted from anthropometry. ''Best compromise'' allometric equations (
y = a . x(b)) revealed a common body mass (BM) exponent of 0.78 (95% C
I, 0.65-0.91). The widely adopted ratio scaling (RS) method assumes th
at the exponent b = 1. In this sample, use of RS would penalize heavie
r subjects by overcorrecting for BM. The equivalent mean FFM exponent
of 1.07 was not different from unity (95% CI, 0.92-1.22). Hence, RS us
ing BM would appear to penalize those subjects who are heavier owing t
o excess fat not excess FFM. Gender differences in LVM were 70, 44, an
d 18%, for absolute values per BM(0.78) and per FFM(1.07), respectivel
y (P < 0.05). This reveals quantitative differences in heart size inde
pendent of body dimensions. We conclude that sample specific AS permit
s meaningful intersubject or intergroup comparisons.