Ds. Reagan et al., CLINICAL-EVALUATION AND TEMPERATURE MONITORING IN PREDICTING VIABILITY IN REPLANTATIONS, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 10(1), 1994, pp. 1-6
Experiences with temperature and clinical monitoring in a series of 11
1 patients with 188 revascularized digits were reviewed. Criteria for
abnormal temperature monitoring were defined. Monitoring of only clini
cal parameters showed a sensitivity of 1.00 and specificity of .97, bu
t this technique was time-consuming and required experienced interpret
ation of subtle clinical changes. Temperature monitoring gave a sensit
ivity of 1.00, while the specificity was only 61. Drops in temperature
were frequently not associated with vascular problems. Review of digi
ts with abnormal clinical or temperature monitoring showed five patter
ns of abnormality. The first three groups had either abnormal clinical
or temperature monitoring, but all fingers survived without reexplora
tion. The fourth and fifth groups showed abnormalities in both clinica
l and temperature monitoring; all but one finger were found to be nonv
iable. Combined clinical and temperature monitoring was highly effecti
ve in early prediction of vascular compromise, with a sensitivity of 1
.00 and a specificity of .99. The authors recommend the use of tempera
ture monitoring. If a temperature drop occurs, monitoring of the clini
cal parameters can then be done. If both temperature and clinical moni
toring yield abnormal results after a specified time, intervention sho
uld be carried out.