For most fish populations, existing data are insufficient to distingui
sh among competing hypotheses about the best harvest policy. A common
approach is to seek a 'best fit' model, then manage the population as
if this model were correct. Apart from the obvious risk of the 'best f
it' model being incorrect, this approach fails to consider the value o
f policy choices that will provide informative variation in abundance
and accelerate learning about which hypothesis is correct. Modelling i
s no substitute for experience, but models do help to determine what t
ype of data to collect and the worth of management options. To cope wi
th uncertainty about population dynamics, we advocate the use of model
s that explicitly represent alternative hypotheses, the acquisition of
data, and managers' response to new information. By including learnin
g in simulation models, we recognize the value of experimental policie
s that would help distinguish between competing hypotheses. For popula
tions with discrete substocks, replicated experiments can be designed
to control for environmental factors. Such management experiments have
been implemented or proposed for a number of salmonid and groundfish
populations.