ACUTE-LEUKEMIA TREATED WITH INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH AHISTORY OF PREVIOUS CHEMOTHERAPY AND OR RADIOTHERAPY - PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF KARYOTYPE AND PRECEDING MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME/
Hj. Weh, ACUTE-LEUKEMIA TREATED WITH INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH AHISTORY OF PREVIOUS CHEMOTHERAPY AND OR RADIOTHERAPY - PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF KARYOTYPE AND PRECEDING MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME/, Leukemia, 8(1), 1994, pp. 87-91
The prognostic significance of karyotype and of a preceding myelodyspl
astic syndrome (MDS) was evaluated in 57 patients with acute leukemia
(AL) treated with intensive chemotherapy. All patients had a history o
f previous chemo- and/or radiotherapy for a neoplastic disease. Acute
nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) was diagnosed in 49 patients, six patie
nts suffered from acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL) and one patient from
biphenotypic and undifferentiated AL, respectively. Chromosomal aberra
tion rate was 91%. In 54% of the patients, simple or specific chromoso
mal anomalies with not more than three cytogenetic defects were found,
such as t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), t(9;11) and t(4;11). Only 37% of
the patients had a karyotype highly characteristic of sAL with more th
an 4 structural cytogenetic defects, and/or -5, 5q-, -7, 7q-. This unu
sual distribution of cytogenetic defects in these patients is undoubte
dly due to patient selection, since only patients who received aggress
ive chemotherapy were included in this study. 25 patients had previous
ly been diagnosed as having MDS. Presence or absence of a preceding MD
S and karyotype were predictive parameters for achievement of complete
remission (CR). CR was obtained in 47% of the patients with normal ka
ryotype or simple aberrations, but only in 24% of the patients with co
mplex anomalies (p = 0.09). Patients without a prior MDS had a higher
CR rate (53%) than patients with a preceding MDS (20%) (p = 0.02). CR
rate was highest in patients with a normal karyotype or simple aberrat
ions without previous MDS (56%), compared to those with complex anomal
ies and a prior MDS (14%) (p = 0.02). We conclude that, from a clinica
l point of view, AL in the former patients should be considered as de
novo AL and not as secondary, therapy-related AL and that therapeutic
nihilism is no longer justified in these patients.