A. Hagemeyer et al., IMPROVEMENTS OF THE PEEL TEST FOR ADHESION EVALUATION OF THIN METALLIC-FILMS ON POLYMERIC SUBSTRATES, Journal of adhesion science and technology, 8(1), 1994, pp. 29-40
For evaluating the adhesion of thin metallic films with thicknesses in
the range of 50-1000 nm on polymeric substrates, the following varian
t of the peel test is often applied: a hot melt foil such as ethylene
acrylic acid (EAA) is heat-laminated onto the metal side of the metal/
polymer composite and subsequently this flexible auxiliary foil is pee
led off from the polymeric substrate, hopefully, together with the met
al layer. In cases where the adhesion of the metal layer to the polyme
ric substrate is very good (peel forces greater than or equal to 5 N/c
m), instead of peeling off the metal layer, cohesive failure within th
e laminated EAA foil occurs and the EAA starts to tear or even break d
ue to overstretching. Two improvements of this standard peel test vari
ant have been developed to overcome the problem of the limited EAA coh
esive strength and thereby to extend the upper test limit. One is to g
lue another thin and flexible but tearproof reinforcing foil [such as
polyimide (PI) with a thickness of 7.5 mu m] with an epoxy adhesive on
to the EAA foil, thus preventing the EAA from being excessively stretc
hed. The other new method consists in using a semicrystalline auxiliar
y polymeric foil with a very high tensile strength, such as poly(ethyl
eneterephthalate) (PET) or poly(ethylenenaphthalate) (PEN), and pretre
ating the surface of this auxiliary foil by UV-excimer laser irradiati
on leading to amorphization of its near-surface zone. The amorphized s
urface can then, just like the ordinary hot melt foil, be easily heat-
laminated to the metal surface with excellent adhesion. As the polymer
morphology is influenced by the excimer laser treatment to a maximum
depth of only a few hundred nanometres (penetration depth of the UV ir
radiation) with the bulk material remaining completely unchanged, the
high tensile strength of the semicrystalline auxiliary foil is conserv
ed, allowing high peel forces to be achieved without reaching the cohe
sive failure limit of the foil.