THE STANDARD OF CARE IS NOT SO STANDARD

Citation
Gj. Gittler et Ejc. Goldstein, THE STANDARD OF CARE IS NOT SO STANDARD, Clinical infectious diseases, 24(2), 1997, pp. 254-257
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology,Immunology,"Infectious Diseases
ISSN journal
10584838
Volume
24
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
254 - 257
Database
ISI
SICI code
1058-4838(1997)24:2<254:TSOCIN>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Malpractice lawsuits affect most physicians at some point in their car eer, Proving that malpractice has been committed is based on substanti ation of a variety of elements, including that the patient was rendere d care that was ''below the standard'' of care, While many physicians believe that the ''standard'' will be judged objectively on the basis of published scientific sources and accepted conventions, the standard is established rather by the testimony of expert witness(es). It is t he expert testimony that sets the standard and is proof of the standar d, The testimony is open for acceptance or rejection by the judge or j ury for a variety of nonscientific reasons, We review what the defenda nt doctor might expect regarding proof required to establish breach of the standard of care and what the prudent expert should be obliged to demonstrate.