COMPARISON OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC, SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC, AND FLUOROMETRIC METHODS FOR DETERMINING CHLOROPHYLL A CONCENTRATIONS IN ESTUARINE SEDIMENTS

Citation
J. Pinckney et al., COMPARISON OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC, SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC, AND FLUOROMETRIC METHODS FOR DETERMINING CHLOROPHYLL A CONCENTRATIONS IN ESTUARINE SEDIMENTS, Journal of microbiological methods, 19(1), 1994, pp. 59-66
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology,"Biochemical Research Methods
ISSN journal
01677012
Volume
19
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
59 - 66
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-7012(1994)19:1<59:COHLS>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
There are currently three methods that are used for routine measuremen ts of chlorophyll (Chl)alpha concentrations in extraction solvents. Hi gh-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) provides the most accurate measurement of Chl alpha, but requires ca. 20 to 25 min processing ti me for each sample. Spectrophotometric (SPEC) and fluorometric (FLUO) methods are less accurate, but require much less (1 to 5 min) processi ng time per sample. The purpose of this study was to determine the acc uracy of SPEC. and FLUO methods for measuring Chl alpha extracted from estuarine sediment samples. The SPEC method overestimated the Chl alp ha concentration by 16% but the relationship between SPEC and HPLC val ues was constant. The FLUO method underestimated Chl alpha concentrati ons by 3% and the relationship to HPLC determined values was also cons tant. A paired-comparison of SPEC and FLUO methods showed that althoug h the values were linearly correlated, the FLUO method produced lower Chl alpha values than the SPEC method. Although SPEC and FLUO methods overestimate and underestimate (respectively) sediment Chi a concentra tions, the relationship was linear across a wide range of naturally oc curring concentrations. Both SPEC and FLUO methods are suitable for sh owing relative differences in Chl alpha concentrations, but should be corrected when absolute concentrations are important.