COMPARISON OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC, SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC, AND FLUOROMETRIC METHODS FOR DETERMINING CHLOROPHYLL A CONCENTRATIONS IN ESTUARINE SEDIMENTS
J. Pinckney et al., COMPARISON OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC, SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC, AND FLUOROMETRIC METHODS FOR DETERMINING CHLOROPHYLL A CONCENTRATIONS IN ESTUARINE SEDIMENTS, Journal of microbiological methods, 19(1), 1994, pp. 59-66
There are currently three methods that are used for routine measuremen
ts of chlorophyll (Chl)alpha concentrations in extraction solvents. Hi
gh-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) provides the most accurate
measurement of Chl alpha, but requires ca. 20 to 25 min processing ti
me for each sample. Spectrophotometric (SPEC) and fluorometric (FLUO)
methods are less accurate, but require much less (1 to 5 min) processi
ng time per sample. The purpose of this study was to determine the acc
uracy of SPEC. and FLUO methods for measuring Chl alpha extracted from
estuarine sediment samples. The SPEC method overestimated the Chl alp
ha concentration by 16% but the relationship between SPEC and HPLC val
ues was constant. The FLUO method underestimated Chl alpha concentrati
ons by 3% and the relationship to HPLC determined values was also cons
tant. A paired-comparison of SPEC and FLUO methods showed that althoug
h the values were linearly correlated, the FLUO method produced lower
Chl alpha values than the SPEC method. Although SPEC and FLUO methods
overestimate and underestimate (respectively) sediment Chi a concentra
tions, the relationship was linear across a wide range of naturally oc
curring concentrations. Both SPEC and FLUO methods are suitable for sh
owing relative differences in Chl alpha concentrations, but should be
corrected when absolute concentrations are important.