Ej. Gustafson et al., EVALUATING SPATIAL PATTERN OF WILDLIFE HABITAT - A CASE-STUDY OF THE WILD TURKEY (MELEAGRIS-GALLOPAVO), The American midland naturalist, 131(1), 1994, pp. 24-33
The evaluation of the spatial configuration of habitat is often diffic
ult due to large geographic areas to be evaluated and the subjective n
ature of spatial pattern assessment. Habitat quality for wild turkey p
opulations has a spatial component related to the arrangement of habit
at elements across large geographic areas. Indices of habitat fragment
ation were used to quantitatively describe the components of habitat a
ssessment now evaluated subjectively by experienced wild turkey biolog
ists, including a proximity index that distinguishes isolated forest p
atches from those that are part of a cluster of forest patches. These
indices were used to mathematically classify landscapes into discrete
quality categories and the classifications were compared to subjective
assessments made by experienced turkey biologists. Mathematical class
ifications of landscapes agreed with expert judgment when the proximit
y index and proportion of forest were used to characterize the spatial
pattern of forest habitat. None of the indices alone were adequate to
correctly classify all test landscape samples. Mean values of the ind
ices were compared between study areas of different quality as wild tu
rkey habitat. Study areas of optimal and suboptimal quality were more
different from each other than were suboptimal and poor study sites. T
he proximity index is a valuable quantitative measure of habitat spati
al pattern that provides information related to subjective, expert ass
essment of landscape suitability for use by wild turkeys. These quanti
tative measures add objectivity to the assessment of the spatial compo
nents of wild turkey habitat, and provide additional information that
can be used to help identify the best potential turkey release sites.
These methods can be extended to the evaluation of the spatial distrib
ution of habitat for other wildlife species, and can provide quantitat
ive spatial information for hypothesis testing.