Xde. Guo et al., FINITE-ELEMENT MODELING OF DAMAGE ACCUMULATION IN TRABECULAR BONE UNDER CYCLIC LOADING, Journal of biomechanics, 27(2), 1994, pp. 145-155
A two-dimensional finite element model of an idealized trabecular bone
specimen was developed to study trabecular bone damage accumulation d
uring cyclic compressive loading. The specimen was modeled as a two-di
mensional honeycomb-like structure made up of an array of hexagonal ce
lls. Each trabecula was modeled as a linearly elastic beam element wit
h the same material properties as cortical bone. Initial microcracks w
ere assumed to exist within the oblique trabeculae and to grow accordi
ng to the Paris law. Forces and moments were computed in each trabecul
a and the microcracks were allowed to propagate until fracture occurre
d. Between cycles, fractured trabeculae were removed from the finite e
lement mesh, and force and moment distributions were calculated for th
e next cycle. This iterative process was continued until the simulated
trabecular bone specimen showed a 10% reduction in modulus. Creep fai
lure was also studied using a single cell analysis, in which a closed-
form solution was obtained after prescribing the creep properties of t
he trabeculae. The results of the crack propagation analysis showed th
at fractures of only a small number of individual trabeculae can cause
a substantial reduction in the modulus of the trabecular bone specime
n model. Statistical tests were performed to compare the slopes and in
tercepts of the S-N curves of our model predictions to those of experi
mentally derived S-N curves for bovine trabecular bone. There was no s
ignificant difference (p > 0.2 for both slope and intercept) between o
ur model predictions and the experimentally derived S-N curves for the
low-stress, high-cycle range. For the high-stress, low-cycle range, t
he crack propagation model overestimated the fatigue life for a given
stress level (for slope, p < 0.001), while the creep analysis agreed w
ell with the experimental data (for slope, p < 0.2). These findings su
ggest that the primary failure mechanism for low-stress, high-cycle fa
tigue of trabecular bone is crack growth and propagation, while the pr
imary failure mechanism for high-stress, low-cycle fatigue is creep de
formation and fracture. Furthermore, our results suggest that the modu
lus of trabecular bone at the specimen level may be highly sensitive t
o fractures of individual trabeculae.