THE ORIGIN OF ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE LOWER CONTINENTAL-CRUST - SALINE WATER OR GRAPHITE

Magnetotelluric measurements show the lower continental crust to be el ectrically conductive globally, typically 100-1000 times more conducti ve than dry rocks measured in the laboratory and 10-100 times more con ductive than the middle to upper crust. The relatively uniform low res istivity is a fundamental regional characteristic of the lower contine ntal crust upon which local anomalies are superimposed. Conduction mec hanisms must exist that are not active in the upper crust. This paper documents geophysical observations that provide important constraints on the mechanisms. They include the following: (1) the resistivity and the depth to the conductive layer show little lateral change across m any large-scale geological terrane and structural boundaries; (2) the lower crust on average is more conductive in Phanerozoic areas than in Precambrian areas (10-30 Omega m vs. 100-300 Omega m, for a layer of about 10 km thickness); (3) the depth to the top of the conductive lay er is generally shallower in young areas than in Precambrian regions ( 10-20 km vs. 20-35 km); the depth appears to be associated with heat f low and commonly corresponds to a present temperature of 350-400 degre es C; (4) in some areas there appear to be correlations between the re sistivity of the lower crust and seismic reflectivity, seismic velocit y, and seismic attenuation. The most probable candidates for the condu ction mechanism are small amounts of interconnected saline pore fluids and interconnected thin films of graphite. An explanation involving a bout 1% interconnected saline pore fluids is consistent with these con straints, but there are difficulties reconciling the pore interconnect ion necessary to give low resistivity with the low permeability requir ed to keep the lower-crustal fluid from escaping upward, and with the inference from metamorphic geology that the lower crust consists of dr y granulite rocks. The explanation involving thin graphite films less readily explains some of the geophysical constraints such as the diffe rence between Phanerozoic and Precambrian regions and the depth contro l by temperature. However, this mechanism allows a lower crust with a dry granulite mineralogy as otherwise inferred especially in shield ar eas.