Mj. Muller et al., ADENOSINE A(1) RECEPTORS ARE NOT INVOLVED IN CONTRACTION OF CANINE GASTRIC MUSCULARIS MUCOSAE BY ADENOSINE-ANALOGS, European journal of pharmacology, 251(2-3), 1994, pp. 151-156
In vitro contractility studies were conducted in canine gastric muscul
aris mucosae muscle strips with the adenosine analogues 2-chloroadenos
ine (CIAD), 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), 5'-(N-cyclopropyl)-
carboxamidoadenosine (CPCA), R-N-6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA
), S-PIA, N-6-cyclohexyladenosine (S-PIA) and carboxyethyl)phenylamino
-5'-N-carboxamidoadenosine (CGS21680) as well as the A(1)-selective an
tagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX). Adenosine analogu
es contracted the muscle strips with the following rank order of poten
cy: CPCA > NECA > CIAD > R-PIA > CHA > S-PIA > CGS21680. CPCA, R-PIA,
and CHA were partial agonists.: At a concentration selective for adeno
sine A(1) receptors (50 nM), DPCPX did not alter the concentration-res
ponse curves to CIAD or CHA. However, at higher concentrations (1-10 m
u M), DPCPX antagonized CIAD-mediated contractions in a competitive ma
nner (pA(2) = 6.96; slope = 0.93). CIAD-mediated contraction was not a
ltered by treatment of the muscle strips with tetrodotoxin (1 mu g/ml)
or mepyramine (1 mu M). Our results indicate that adenosine A(1) rece
ptors, nerves or mast cells are not involved in contraction of canine
gastric muscularis mucosae by adenosine analogues.