Pem. Fine et Er. Zell, OUTBREAKS IN HIGHLY VACCINATED POPULATIONS - IMPLICATIONS FOR STUDIESOF VACCINE PERFORMANCE, American journal of epidemiology, 139(1), 1994, pp. 77-90
Most of the factors associated with the failure of a Vaccination to pr
ovide protective immunity are not distributed uniformly or randomly wi
thin populations. This paper explores the extent to which a nonrandom
distribution of vaccination failures and the selection of exceptional
situations for investigation may influence estimates of vaccine perfor
mance. The authors show that outbreak investigations will tend to unde
restimate vaccination efficacy, and that the extent of underestimation
will be related directly to the size of the epidemic triggering an in
vestigation, the vaccination coverage in the community, and the extent
of clustering of vaccination failures in the population; it will be r
elated inversely to the size of and contact intensity within the inves
tigated community. These potential sources of bias are not the only pr
oblems that arise in estimating vaccine efficacy, but they should be t
aken into consideration when analyzing and interpreting outbreak situa
tions. The fact that outbreak investigations carried out within the Un
ited States during the past decade have provided estimates of measles
vaccination efficacy on the order of 95% is consistent with a somewhat
higher overall ''true'' efficacy of current vaccines and procedures i
n the total population. It is important to understand better the frequ
ency, distribution, and risk factors for vaccination failures in popul
ations.