Ab. Hartman et al., LOCAL IMMUNE-RESPONSE AND PROTECTION IN THE GUINEA-PIG KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS MODEL-FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION WITH SHIGELLA VACCINES, Infection and immunity, 62(2), 1994, pp. 412-420
This study used the guinea pig keratoconjunctivitis model to examine t
he importance of route of administration (mucosal versus parenteral),
frequency and timing of immunization (primary versus boosting immuniza
tion), and form of antigen given (live attenuated vaccine strain versu
s O-antigen-protein conjugate) on the production of protective immunit
y against Shigella infection. Since local immune response to the lipop
olysaccharide (LPS) O-antigen of Shigella spp. is thought to be import
ant for protection against disease, O-antigen-specific antibody-secret
ing cells (ASC) in the spleen and regional lymph nodes of immunized an
imals were measured by using an ELISPOT assay. Results indicated that
protective efficacy was associated with a strong O-antigen-specific AS
C response, particularly in the superficial ventral cervical lymph nod
es draining the conjunctivae. In naive animals, a strong ASC response
in the cervical lymph nodes and protection against challenge were dete
cted only in animals that received a mucosal immunization. Protection
in these animals was increased by a boosting mucosal immunization. Whi
le parenteral immunization alone with an O-antigen-protein conjugate v
accine did not protect naive animals against challenge, a combined par
enteral-mucosal regimen elicited enhanced protection without the addit
ion of a boosting immunization. Although O-antigen-specific serum immu
noglobulin A titers were significantly higher in animals receiving a m
ucosal immunization, there was no apparent correlation between levels
of serum antibody and protection against disease.