Mw. Crawford et al., THE EFFECT OF ADENOSINE-INDUCED HYPOTENSION OF SYSTEMIC AND SPLANCHNIC HEMODYNAMICS DURING HALOTHANE OF SEVOFLURANE ANESTHESIA IN THE RAT, Anesthesiology, 80(1), 1994, pp. 159-167
Background: It has been suggested that the liver may be at risk for is
chemic damage during adenosine-induced hypotension. This notion, howev
er, is somewhat inconsistent with the understanding that adenosine is
a powerful vasodilator of the splanchnic circulation. To help clarify
the effect of adenosine-induced hypotension on splanchnic hemodynamics
, we studied the systemic and splanchnic hemodynamic responses to aden
osine, both alone and in the presence of halothane or sevoflurane. Met
hods: Systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics were determined during the
infusion of adenosine in 36 rats allocated randomly to one of three st
udy groups: (1) awake, (2) halothane anesthesia (1.0 MAC), or (3) sevo
flurane anesthesia (1.0 MAC). Adenosine was infused at a rate sufficie
nt to decrease the mean arterial pressure by 35-38% from awake control
values. Cardiac output and organ blood flows were measured using the
radiolabeled microsphere technique. Results: Adenosine infusion produc
ed stable hypotension of rapid onset due to a reduction in systemic va
scular resistance. Stroke volume increased, but cardiac output remaine
d unchanged in the awake and sevoflurane groups because of a decrease
in heart rate. Infusion of adenosine during halothane anesthesia incre
ased cardiac output enough to compensate for the decrease in cardiac o
utput due to halothane alone. In the splanchnic circulation, there was
an increase in portal tributary (42%, P<0.01) and hepatic arterial(38
%, P<0.05) blood flows during adenosine infusion in awake rats. This r
e suited in an overall increase in total liver blood flow (42%, P<0.01
). Halothane anesthesia was associated with a decrease in portal tribu
tary blood flow (28%, P<0.05). In contrast, sevoflurane anesthesia was
associated with an increase in hepatic arterial flow (35%, P<0.05) bu
t with no change in portal tributary blood flow. During halothane anes
thesia, adenosine infusion increased portal tributary (90%, P<0.01) an
d hepatic arterial (37%, P<0.05) blood flows, thereby increasing total
liver blood flow to values similar to those in awake adenosine infuse
d rats. During sevoflurane anesthesia, adenosine infusion increased po
rtal tributary blood flow (48%, P<0.01), but hepatic arterial blood fl
ow did not increase beyond the values observed during sevoflurane anes
thesia alone. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that adenosine i
s a potent vasodilator of portal tributary and hepatic arterial vascul
ature in the rat and that the splanchnic hemodynamic effects of adenos
ine predominate over those of halothane and sevoflurane.