STIMULATION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SECONDARY ESOPHAGEAL PERISTALSIS IN NORMAL SUBJECTS

Citation
Mn. Schoeman et Rh. Holloway, STIMULATION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SECONDARY ESOPHAGEAL PERISTALSIS IN NORMAL SUBJECTS, Gut, 35(2), 1994, pp. 152-158
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Journal title
GutACNP
ISSN journal
00175749
Volume
35
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
152 - 158
Database
ISI
SICI code
0017-5749(1994)35:2<152:SACOSE>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
The study evaluates the triggering and characteristics of secondary oe sophageal peristalsis in 25 healthy volunteers. Secondary peristalsis was stimulated by rapid intraoesophageal injection of boluses of air a nd water, and by a five second oesophageal distension with a ballon. A ir and water boluses triggered secondary peristalsis that started in t he proximal oesophagus regardless of injection site. Response rates we re volume dependent with 83% of the 20 mi air boluses triggering secon dary peristalsis compared with 2% for the 2 mi water bolus (p<0.0001). Response rates for air and water were similar for equal bolus volumes and were not influenced by the site of injection. In contrast, balloo n distension usually induced a synchronous contraction above the ballo on, with secondary peristalsis starting below the balloon after deflat ion. The peristaltic response rate to balloon distension was also volu me dependent and the middle balloon was more effective in triggering s econdary peristalsis than either the upper or lower balloons (p<0.001) . Secondary peristaltic amplitude was less than that of primary perist alsis (p<0.001). Secondary peristaltic velocity with a water bolus was slower (p=0.001) than that of primary peristalsis. Intravenous atropi ne significantly reduced secondary peristaltic responses to all stimul i. There was also a significant reduction in pressure wave amplitude f or air stimulated secondary peristalsis while those for the water resp onses were similar. Secondary peristaltic velocity with air and water boluses was not changed by atropine. The reproducibility of testing se condary peristalsis was examined six volunteers and did not show any s ignificant differences on separate test days in response rate and peri staltic amplitude or velocity. It is concluded that in normal subjects , secondary peristalsis can be more reliably triggered by intraoesopha geal air or water infusion than balloon distension. Secondary peristal tic amplitude and velocity are stimulus but not site or volume depende nt and propagation is partially mediated by cholinergic nerves.