A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF VANCOMYCIN VERSUS TEICOPLANIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF GRAM-POSITIVE BACTEREMIA IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER

Citation
Kvi. Rolston et al., A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF VANCOMYCIN VERSUS TEICOPLANIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF GRAM-POSITIVE BACTEREMIA IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER, The Journal of infectious diseases, 169(2), 1994, pp. 350-355
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Infectious Diseases
ISSN journal
00221899
Volume
169
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
350 - 355
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-1899(1994)169:2<350:ARDTOV>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing teicoplanin and vancomycin for the treatment of gram-positive bacteremias in neut ropenic patients, teicoplanin was given at 6 mg/kg of body weight ever y 24 h intravenously (iv) after initial loading every 12 h for three d oses, while vancomycin was administered at 15 mg/kg every 12 h iv. At enrollment, both groups were comparable in age, sex, underlying hemato logic or neoplastic disorder, baseline renal functions, and incidence of neutropenia. Treatment was successful in 19 (90%) of 21 patients wh o received teicoplanin and 24 (96%) of 25 who received vancomycin (P=. 58). Adverse reactions occurred more often in the vancomycin group (31 %) than in the teicoplanin group (9%; P=.06) and were primarily cutane ous or gastrointestinal. In conclusion, teicoplanin was better tolerat ed than vancomycin, and no statistically significant difference in eff icacy was detected with the sample size in this study.