Kvi. Rolston et al., A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF VANCOMYCIN VERSUS TEICOPLANIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF GRAM-POSITIVE BACTEREMIA IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER, The Journal of infectious diseases, 169(2), 1994, pp. 350-355
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing teicoplanin
and vancomycin for the treatment of gram-positive bacteremias in neut
ropenic patients, teicoplanin was given at 6 mg/kg of body weight ever
y 24 h intravenously (iv) after initial loading every 12 h for three d
oses, while vancomycin was administered at 15 mg/kg every 12 h iv. At
enrollment, both groups were comparable in age, sex, underlying hemato
logic or neoplastic disorder, baseline renal functions, and incidence
of neutropenia. Treatment was successful in 19 (90%) of 21 patients wh
o received teicoplanin and 24 (96%) of 25 who received vancomycin (P=.
58). Adverse reactions occurred more often in the vancomycin group (31
%) than in the teicoplanin group (9%; P=.06) and were primarily cutane
ous or gastrointestinal. In conclusion, teicoplanin was better tolerat
ed than vancomycin, and no statistically significant difference in eff
icacy was detected with the sample size in this study.