Mf. Osti et al., COMPARISION BETWEEN TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY WITH RECTAL INFLATION OF GAS IN PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF LOWER RECTAL-CANCER, European radiology, 7(1), 1997, pp. 26-30
Computed tomography with rectal air insufflation was compared with tra
nsrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in 63 patients. The CT protocol involv
ed pre- and postcontrast scans with 5 mm slice thickness following air
insufflation in IV antiperistaltic agent. Of the patients, 79% were s
canned in the prone position. Results of the preoperative examinations
were compared with the histological findings. The CT examination had
an accuracy rate of 74%, predicting perirectal spread with a sensitivi
ty of 83% and a specificity of 62%, whereas the corresponding figures
for TRUS were 83, 91 and 67%. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificit
y of CT and TRUS for nodal involvement were 57, 56, 57, 66, 68 and 64%
-respectively. These findings confirm that TRUS is more accurate than
CT in local tumour (T) staging and in detecting nodal (N) spread. Howe
ver, the appropriate CT technique shows spread of tumour outside the r
ectal wall and locoregional lymph nodes with reasonable size. TRUS and
CT correctly staged only 57 and 43%, respectively, of cases with noda
l metastases with maximum diameter of 5 mm. TRUS sometimes overstaged
perirectal growth of tumour in 7 patients, due to inflammation (5 pati
ents) or incorrect positioning of the balloon in relation to the tumou
r surface (2 patients).