ELEVATED LEVELS OF AN ANGIOGENIC PEPTIDE, BASIC FIBROBLAST GROWTH-FACTOR, IN THE URINE OF PATIENTS WITH A WIDE SPECTRUM OF CANCERS

Citation
M. Nguyen et al., ELEVATED LEVELS OF AN ANGIOGENIC PEPTIDE, BASIC FIBROBLAST GROWTH-FACTOR, IN THE URINE OF PATIENTS WITH A WIDE SPECTRUM OF CANCERS, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 86(5), 1994, pp. 356-361
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Volume
86
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
356 - 361
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Background: Experimental evidence supports the hypothesis that the dev elopment of blood vessels is fundamental to the growth and metastasis of solid tumors. Elevated levels of the angiogenic peptide basic fibro blast growth factor (bFGF) have been significantly correlated with the status and extent of disease in bladder cancer. Purpose: We measured the bFGF levels in patients with cancer in organs other than the bladd er to determine whether elevated levels accompany these cancers. Metho ds: Urine samples were collected from 950 patients having a wide varie ty of solid tumors, leukemia, or lymphoma and from a control group of 87 healthy volunteers and 198 patients with noncancer-related diseases , Levels of bFGF in samples prepared from the urine were measured usin g an enzyme bioassay. Results: Male control subjects had a median bFGF level of 151 pg/g and female control subjects a median of 237 pg/g, w ith a combined ''th percentile of 619 pg/g. An elevated level of bFGF was found in the urine of some of the patients with every type of tumo r studied except cervical carcinoma. For example, patients with active local cancers had a median level of 312 pg/g. Those with active, meta static cancers had a median level of 479 pg/g and a 90th percentile le vel of 14143 pg/g. After ''elevated'' was defined to mean higher than the 90th percentile level for controls, 31% of patients with local act ive and 47% of patients with metastatic active cancers showed elevated bFGF levels. Survival among cancer patients at the median follow-up t ime was 85%-88% for those with ''normal'' and 71%-72% for those with ' 'elevated'' urine bFGF levels. Implications: Our results suggest that bFGF in urine deserves further evaluation of its potential use as a mo nitor of therapy or as a predictor of outcome once a cancer has been d iagnosed.