Our purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic value of three-dimensional
(3D) CT surface reconstruction inn spinal fractures in comparison with
axial and reformatted images. A total of 50 patients with different C
T-proven spinal fractures were analysed retrospectively. Based on axia
l scans and reformatted images, the spinal fractures were classified a
ccording to several classifications as Magerl for the thoraco-lumbar a
nd lower cervical spine by one radiologist. Another radiologist perfor
med 3D CT surface reconstructions with the aim of characterizing the d
ifferent types of spinal fractures. A third radiologist classified the
3D CT surface reconstruction according to the Magerl classification.
The results of the blinded reading process were compared. It was check
ed to see in which type and subgroup 3D surface reconstructions were h
elpful. Readers one and two obtained the same results in the classific
ation. The 3D surface reconstruction did not yield any additional diag
nostic information concerning type A and B injuries. Indeed, the full
extent of the fracture could be easier recognized with axial and refor
matted images in all cases. In 10 cases of C injuries, the dislocation
of parts of vertebrae could be better recognized with the help of 3D
reconstructions. A 3D CT surface reconstruction is only useful in rota
tional and shear vertebral injuries (Magerl type C injury).