There has been little study of the abuse liability of ephedrine, a nat
urally occurring drug used in medicine for thousands of years and curr
ently sold as a ''legal'' stimulant. The present study measured the re
inforcing and subjective effects of ephedrine in a group of 27 adults
(18 females and 9 males) with no history of drug dependence. A discret
e-trial choice procedure was used to assess the reinforcing effects of
a single oral dose of ephedrine selected to produce a moderate subjec
tive response in each subject (range: 37.5-75 mg). A number of variabl
es (gender, current and past drug use, personality, and baseline mood
and arousal) were examined in an attempt to identify sources of variab
ility in response to ephedrine. Of the 27 subjects, 5 chose ephedrine
on either 2 or 3 out of a possible 3 occasions; overall, ephedrine was
chosen on 17% of occasions. In the group as a whole, ephedrine had no
effect on ratings of drug liking, but did increase ratings of ''high'
' and scores on the MBG (''euphoria'') scale of the Addiction Research
Center Inventory. Ephedrine also increased scores on a number of mood
scales reflecting CNS stimulation and anxiety. Ephedrine choice was p
ositively associated with current use of marijuana and lower levels of
baseline anxiety and hunger, as well as with lower scores on two scal
es measuring dimensions of the personality trait of harm avoidance. Ma
les and females differed in their response to ephedrine - males chose
ephedrine more frequently than females and showed a more positive mood
response to the drug. When compared to the results of a prior study o
f the same design with d-amphetamine, these results demonstrate that e
phedrine produces a different profile of subjective effects and is a l
ess efficacious reinforcer than amphetamine, suggesting that ephedrine
has a lower liability for abuse.