Jt. Heikkila et al., BIOACTIVE GLASS VERSUS HYDROXYLAPATITE IN RECONSTRUCTION OF OSTEOCHONDRAL DEFECTS IN THE RABBIT, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica, 64(6), 1993, pp. 678-682
We studied osseointegration of a bioactive glass (BG) and hydroxylapat
ite (HA) in rabbit femur epiphyseal and metaphyseal regions. 17 BG and
24 HA cones implanted in defects through arthrotomy were analyzed. Th
e holes for implants were drilled through distal femur joint surfaces.
The cartilage wound repaired generally by fibrous tissue. Histomorpho
metry showed that 61, 78, and 79 percent of BG surface was covered by
bone at 3, 6, and 12 weeks, respectively. The corresponding figures fo
r HA were 47, 67, and 78 percent. Chemical bonding between bone and im
plants of both types was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SE
M) and energy-dispersive x-ray analysis (EDXA). Formation of a calcium
phosphaterich layer on the surface BG implant was demonstrated by EDX
A. Our results indicate that the osseointegration rate of bioactive gl
ass does not differ from that of hydroxylapatite.