Ma. Perezpinzon et al., RAPID PRECONDITIONING PROTECTS RATS AGAINST ISCHEMIC NEURONAL DAMAGE AFTER 3 BUT NOT 7 DAYS OF REPERFUSION FOLLOWING GLOBAL CEREBRAL-ISCHEMIA, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism, 17(2), 1997, pp. 175-182
Earlier studies indicated that sublethal ischemic insults separated by
many hours may ''precondition'' and, thereby, protect tissues from su
bsequent insults. In Wistar rats, we examined the hypothesis that isch
emic preconditioning (IPC) can improve histopathological outcome even
if the ''conditioning'' and ''test'' ischemic insults are separated by
only 30 min. Normothermic (36.5-37 degrees C) global cerebral ischemi
a was produced by bilateral carotid artery ligation after lowering mea
n systemic blood pressure. The conditioning ischemic insult lasted 2 m
in and was associated with a time sufficient to provoke ''anoxic depol
arization'' (AD) (i.e., the abrupt maximal increase in extracellular p
otassium ion activity). After 30 min of reperfusion, 10-min test ische
mia was produced, and histopathology was assessed 3 and 7 days later.
After 3 days of reperfusion, neuroprotection was most robust in the le
ft lateral, middle and medial subsections of the hippocampal CA1 subfi
eld and in the cortex, where protection was 91, 76, 70 and 86%, respec
tively. TPC also protected the right lateral, middle and medial subsec
tions of the hippocampal CA1 region. These data demonstrate that neuro
protection against acute neuronal injury can be achieved by conditioni
ng insults followed by only short (30 min) periods of reperfusion. How
ever, neuroprotection almost disappeared when reperfusion was continue
d for 7 days. When test ischemia was decreased to 7 min, a clear trend
of neuroprotection by IPC was observed. These data suggest that subse
quent rescue of neuronal populations could be achieved with better und
erstanding of the neuroprotective mechanisms involved in this rapid IP
C model.