A prospective cohort study of 1098 postmenopausal Japanese-American wo
men evaluated the relationship between baseline non-spine fractures an
d new (incident) spine fractures. At the baseline examination in 1981,
prevalent non-spine fractures were ascertained by interview, and prev
alent spine fractures by radiograph. Bone mass measurements of the dis
tal radius, proximal radius, calcaneus (1981), the lumbar spine (1984)
were obtained and repeated at 1- to 2-year intervals. Women with exis
ting non-spine fractures have a threefold greater risk of subsequent s
pine fractures, independent of bone mass, and independent of the known
association between prevalent spine fractures and subsequent spine fr
actures. Women with both a prevalent non-spine fracture and low bone m
ass (50th percentile or lower) have an eightfold greater risk of new s
pine fractures compared with women above the 50th percentile of bone m
ass and no prevalent fractures. In addition to low bone mass, both pre
valent spine fractures and prevalent non-spine fractures are strong ri
sk factors for subsequent spine fracture. These data suggest that not
all osteoporotic risk factors are expressed via bone mass, and that ot
her, unmeasured risk factors, such as bone quality defects, may explai
n these results. In clinical terms, women with both prevalent fracture
s and low bone mass should be recognized as being at extremely high ri
sk, and treatment potency should be commensurate with this level of ri
sk.