Jp. Gertler et al., CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY FOR UNSTABLE AND COMPELLING NEUROLOGIC CONDITIONS - DO RESULTS JUSTIFY AN AGGRESSIVE APPROACH, Journal of vascular surgery, 19(1), 1994, pp. 32-42
Purpose: In a retrospective study the outcome of 70 carotid endarterec
tomies (CEA) in 68 patients with neurologically unstable conditions or
anatomically compelling findings on carotid angiography was examined
to more accurately identify patients who might benefit from CEA in thi
s setting. Methods: Out of a total of 1734 CEAs performed from 1978 to
1992, five groups of patients were selected: group A, stroke in evolu
tion with tight stenosis (n = 5); group C, crescendo transient ischemi
c attacks (CTIA) continuing despite heparin (n = 14); group D, CTIA (a
bove criteria) ceasing with heparin (n = 21); and group E, anatomicall
y compelling situation on carotid angiography (n = 13). Data collected
included preoperative and postoperative Neurologic Event Severity Sco
re (NESS), CHAT classification, arteriosclerosis risk factors, demogra
phics, and long-term overall and transient ischemic attack/stroke-free
survival rates. Results: Risk factors and demographics were similar i
n all groups. By NESS criteria the conditions of 97.3% of patients in
the neurologically unstable groups A to C were improved or stabilized
after operation, with one deterioration (2.7%). All patients in group
B either stabilized or improved. In group D, one patient's NESS deteri
orated, resulting in 3.5% overall morbidity rate and no deaths for gro
ups A to D. Follow-up showed an overall survival rate by Kaplan-Meier
analysis equivalent to a matched control population, with 85% alive at
5 years. The cumulative TLA/stroke-free survival rate at 5 years was
75%. Conclusions: In this retrospective series, CEA performed for comp
elling or unstable neurologic findings carried low morbidity and morta
lity rates. Early aggressive surgical therapy of neurologically unstab
le patients may be warranted because our results improved on the antic
ipated natural history of the conditions studied. Further clarificatio
n of proper patient selection is necessary before this principle can b
e applied broadly.