Dr. Haynes et al., DISTANCE DEPENDENCE OF ELECTRONIC-ENERGY TRANSFER BETWEEN DONOR AND ACCEPTOR ADLAYERS - P-TERPHENYL AND 9,10-DIPHENYLANTHRACENE, The Journal of chemical physics, 100(3), 1994, pp. 1968-1980
Investigations of energy transfer between adlayers on single-crystal s
urfaces provide a unique opportunity to explore electronic energy tran
sfer in restricted geometries. In this study, laser induced fluorescen
ce techniques and donor quantum yield measurements were used to examin
e the distance dependence of electronic energy transfer between donor
and acceptor adlayers on Al2O3(0001). The donor adlayer was p-terpheny
l, the acceptor adlayer was 9,10-diphenylanthracene, and n-butane was
the variable spacer adlayer. The electronic energy transfer rates vs s
pacer thickness were determined at both 30 and 85 K in ultra high vacu
um. The butane spacer experiments showed that the donor energy transfe
r rate decreased with a 1/d(3) dependence, where d is the thickness of
the spacer adlayer. Given a Forster quantum mechanical or a Kuhn clas
sical energy transfer mechanism with randomly oriented dipoles, a 1/d(
3) distance dependence is consistent with resonance electronic energy
transfer from a two-dimensional donor adlayer to a three-dimensional a
rray of acceptors. The spacer measurements yielded a critical transfer
distance of d(0)=44 +/-4 Angstrom at 30 K and d(0)=33 +/-6 Angstrom a
t 85 K. The differences in the critical transfer distance at 30 and 85
K could be explained by the redshift in the p-terphenyl fluorescence
spectrum at 85 K that reduces the overlap between the donor fluorescen
ce and acceptor absorption spectra. Values of d(0)=44 Angstrom at 30 K
and d(0)=35 Angstrom at 85 K were calculated theoretically from a 1/d
(3) analysis and were in excellent agreement with the experimental mea
surements. The rate of donor-donor intralayer energy migration was als
o determined by measuring the electronic energy transfer rate versus d
onor coverage on the acceptor adlayer. The donor quantum yield measure
ments versus donor adlayer coverage were consistent with the spacer re
sults and indicated that electronic energy migration does not occur wi
thin the p-terphenyl adlayer. These results vs spacer thickness and do
nor coverage reveal that electronic energy transfer in spatially confi
ned geometries can be described using a modified Kuhn energy transfer
mechanism.