Jc. Deutsch et al., VARIATION IN ASCORBIC-ACID OXIDATION ROUTES IN H2O2 AND CUPRIC ION SOLUTION AS DETERMINED BY GC MS/, Analytical chemistry, 66(3), 1994, pp. 345-350
Recent reports have suggested that ascorbic acid protects low-density
lipoprotein from peroxide-induced oxidation, but does not protect and
may actually function as a prooxidant in the presence of cupric ions.
However, dehydroascorbic acid, (the first oxidation product of ascorbi
c acid) has been shown to protect low-density lipoprotein from cupric
ion oxidation but not peroxide-induced oxidation. We have examined the
degradation of ascorbic acid, uniformly labeled [C-13(6)]ascorbic aci
d, and [6,6-H-2(2)]ascorbic acid in hydrogen peroxide and cupric ion s
olutions using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry to determine produ
cts and routes of oxidation using different oxidant sources. We have f
ound that hydrogen peroxide leads to the formation of a six-carbon pro
duct with a mass increment of 32 (a double oxygen addition) relative t
o ascorbic acid, consistent with the oxidation sequence of ascorbic ac
id(mass 176) going to dehydroascorbic acid (mass 174) to 2,3-diketogul
onic acid (mass 192) to 2,3-diketo-4,5,5,6-tetrahydroxyhexanoic acid (
mass 208). Cupric ion solutions, on the other hand, do not appear to i
nduce significant amounts of 2,3-diketo-4,5,5,6-tetrahydroxyhexanoic a
cid but rather lead to the formation of a threo-hexa-2,4-dienoic acid
lactone (mass 174) as the major six-carbon species. These data suggest
that different oxidation stresses lead to solutions containing differ
ent ascorbic acid oxidation products. These ascorbic acid-derived spec
ies could, in turn, interact differently with other substances in the
aqueous environment, including free metal ions and low-density lipopro
tein. This may help explain previous reports showing divergent protect
ive effects of ascorbic acid and dehydroascorbic acid on low-density l
ipoprotein when different oxidation methods are used.