Cl. Sistrom et al., METHODS USED FOR LIVER COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY SCANNING IN COMMUNITY RADIOLOGY PRACTICE, Investigative radiology, 28(12), 1993, pp. 1139-1143
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. A survey conducted in 1987 of mostly academi
c radiologists revealed that 8 of 22 (36%) respondents used bolus enha
nced dynamic technique when performing computed tomography (CT) of the
liver.(1) In the current study, the authors performed a new survey of
private practice radiologists that was over four times larger and had
more comprehensive questions. METHODS. An 18-item questionnaire was s
ent to 260 members of the American College of Radiology. The answers f
rom 98 usable responses were tallied and analyzed. RESULTS. Forty-six
percent of the radiologists polled use bolus enhanced dynamic CT. Thir
ty-three percent still use ionic contrast, and a significantly lower i
odine dose was used when nonionic contrast was chosen. CONCLUSIONS. Th
ere is general agreement in the imaging literature that dynamic enhanc
ed scanning is the method of choice for detecting liver masses with CT
. The authors speculate that cost and convenience considerations stron
gly influence such decisions, because less than 50% the radiologists w
e polled use this somewhat more expensive and time-consuming technique
.