In long occlusions of the superficial femoral artery, possibilities of
revascularization depend on the patency of the above-knee popliteal a
rtery. In case of occlusion of the above-knee popliteal artery, the di
stal anastomosis is to be performed at the below-knee level or more di
stally; in this situation, studies demonstrate a clearcut superiority
of venous bypasses over prosthetic bypasses. Patency of the above-knee
popliteal artery allows to perform a shorter bypass avoiding to cross
the knee joint; given comparable results between venous and prostheti
c above-knee bypasses in certain series, several authors advocated the
preferential, if not systematic use of prosthetic materials at this l
evel; this attitude having the advantage of preserving the saphenous v
ein for later coronary or distal grafting. A critical analysis of stud
ies advocating this therapeutic option reveals that results of prosthe
tic and venous above-knee bypasses are equivalent in only very restric
tive clinical situations (claudication, good runoff) and for follow up
less than 3 years; beyond this follow up, the use of a prosthesis inc
reases the number of secondary procedures necessary for maintaining or
restoring patency and for this reason increases slightly the overall
mortality owing to the operative mortality associated with each reoper
ation. Apart from rare cases represented by fragile and high-risk pati
ents, whose lifespan is likely to be short and in whom a quicker opera
tion is advisable, indications of the use of prosthetic grafts depend
on the limits of the use of the saphenous vein generated by a poor qua
lity or an insufficient diameter