Ca. Morrow et Da. Lockner, PERMEABILITY AND POROSITY OF THE ILLINOIS UPH-3 DRILLHOLE GRANITE ANDA COMPARISON WITH OTHER DEEP DRILLHOLE ROCKS, J GEO R-SOL, 102(B2), 1997, pp. 3067-3075
Permeability, porosity, and volumetric strain measurements were conduc
ted on granite cores obtained at depths of 0.7 to 1.6 km from the Illi
nois UPH 3 drillhole at effective confining pressures from 5 to 100 MP
a. Initial permeabilities were in the range of 10(-17) to 10(-19) m(2)
and dropped rapidly with applied pressure to values between 10(-20) a
nd 10(-24) m(2) at 100 MPa, typical of other deep granite core samples
. These values are several decades lower than equivalent weathered sur
face granites at comparable effective confining pressures, where weath
ering products in cracks and pores inhibit crack closure with applied
pressure. Permeabilities of the Illinois cores were inversely related
to sample,depth, suggesting that stress relief and thermal microfractu
res induced during core retrieval dominated the fluid now. Thus these
samples provide an upper bound on in situ matrix permeability values.
A comparison of core permeability from UPH 3 and other deep drillholes
shows that stress relief damage can often dominate laboratory permeab
ility measurements. We conclude that it may be difficult to make meani
ngful estimates of in situ permeability based on either borehole sampl
es (possible damage during retrieval) or surface-derived analogs (alte
red by weathering). Volumetric strain determined from porosity measure
ments was compared with differential strain analysis (DSA) data report
ed by other investigators on samples from the same depths in the drill
hole. Our strain measurements (0.002 to 0.005 at 100 MPa) were nearly
twice as large as the DSA values, Probably because of the crack-enhanc
ing effects of fluids present in our samples that are absent in the dr
y DSA cores, as well as other time-dependent deformation effects. This
difference in observed strain magnitudes between the two measurement
methods may be an important consideration if strain and/or porosity da
ta from deep core samples are used in models of stress, fluid circulat
ion, and excess fluid pressure generation in the midcrust.