CONCOMITANT SENSITIZATION TO TRIGLYCIDYL ISOCYANURATE, DIAMINODIPHENYLMETHANE AND 2-HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE FROM SILK-SCREEN PRINTING COATINGS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CIRCUIT BOARDS
R. Jolanki et al., CONCOMITANT SENSITIZATION TO TRIGLYCIDYL ISOCYANURATE, DIAMINODIPHENYLMETHANE AND 2-HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE FROM SILK-SCREEN PRINTING COATINGS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CIRCUIT BOARDS, Contact dermatitis, 30(1), 1994, pp. 12-15
A 48-year-old female silk-screen printer had worked in the manufacture
of circuit boards for 12 years before she got the first symptoms of d
ermatitis on her wrists and lower arms. On the 1st patch test session,
epoxy resin and the remainder of the standard series were negative, w
hile a plastics and glues series gave an allergic reaction to 4,4'-dia
minodiphenylmethane (DDM). The 2nd test session revealed allergic reac
tions to several acrylics, several epoxy compounds and 3 ink component
s. According to the material safety data sheets, 1 ink hardener contai
ned DDM, but the causative agent in 1 ink and 1 ink hardener remained
uncertain. The manufacturers of the 2 inks kindly provided us with the
ir components for further patch tests. 2 of these components gave alle
rgic reactions: triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC) and 2-hydroxyethyl met
hacrylate (2-HEMA). Our case report shows that the manufacture of circ
uit boards involves exposure to highly sensitizing chemicals. DDM, TGI
C and 2-HEMA should be remembered as silk-screen printers' potential c
ontact sensitizers in the manufacture of circuit boards.