Re. Schwartz et al., BACTERIAL-ENDOCARDITIS PROPHYLAXIS - WHAT IS RECOMMENDED AND WHAT IS PRACTICED, Journal of clinical anesthesia, 6(1), 1994, pp. 5-9
Study Objective: To determine how often pediatric anesthesiologists fo
llow the American Heart Association (AHA) recommendations for the admi
nistration of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent bacterial endocardit
is (BE). Design: Questionnaires mailed to all members of the Society f
or Pediatric Anesthesia regarding their use of antibiotics to prevent
BE. Setting: Anesthesia department at a university-affiliated children
's hospital. Measurements and Main Results: 898 questionnaires were ma
iled, and 465 questionnaires were returned, yielding a response rate o
f 52 %. When anesthesiologists administer BE prophylaxis intravenously
(IV), they perform an inhalation anesthetic 76 % of the time prior to
establishing IV access. Ninety percent of the respondents stated that
if administration. of antibiotics occurs after a mash induction, they
do not delay incision or instrumentation for 30 minutes. Therefore, r
espondents do not follow AHA recommendations for BE prophylaxis 55 % o
f the time. Of the 465 respondents, only 4 recalled pediatric patients
who developed perioperative BE. Conclusions: The majority of anesthes
iologists responding to this survey routinely do not follow the curren
t AHA recommendations for BE prophylaxis when caring for children. Sin
ce there are no studies demonstrating that administering antibiotics 3
0 minutes prior to invasive procedures is more effective than administ
ering antibiotics immediately prior to invasive procedures, it may be
appropriate to follow a time sequence that is more comfortable and con
venient for pediatric patients. We believe that a reconsideration of t
he current AHA recommendations for BE prophylaxis is warranted.