COMPARATIVE TUMOR-LOCALIZATION OF WHOLE IMMUNOGLOBULIN-G ANTICARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES IMMU-4 AND IMMU-4 F(AB')2 IN COLORECTAL-CANCER PATIENTS

Citation
Jl. Murray et al., COMPARATIVE TUMOR-LOCALIZATION OF WHOLE IMMUNOGLOBULIN-G ANTICARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES IMMU-4 AND IMMU-4 F(AB')2 IN COLORECTAL-CANCER PATIENTS, Cancer, 73(3), 1994, pp. 850-857
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
CancerACNP
ISSN journal
0008543X
Volume
73
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Supplement
S
Pages
850 - 857
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-543X(1994)73:3<850:CTOWIA>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Background, Previous studies in the literature have suggested that rad iolabeled F(ab')(2) fragments might be superior to whole immunoglobuli n G (IgG) for imaging and therapy of cancer because of their greater p enetration in tumors. To test this hypothesis, the authors compared tu mor and normal tissue uptake along with plasma clearance of I-125-labe led monoclonal antibody (MoAb) IMMU-4 whole IgG with its I-131-labeled F(ab')(2) fragment. Methods. Five patients with either liver metastas es from colorectal cancer (n = 4) or intact primary tumors (n = 1) rec eived a combination of I-125-IMMU-4 IgG (2 mCi/1 mg) plus I-131-IMMU-4 F(ab')(2) (10 mCi/1 mg) as a single 1-hour intravenous infusion on da y 1. Serial blood samples were taken for up to 72 hours postinfusion t o determine plasma clearance of each MoAb. On days 3-9, patients under went exploratory laparotomy in which biopsies of tumor as well as norm al tissues (liver, normal colon, lymph node, and blood) were obtained. Tissues were weighed and counted in a gamma counter, and the percent of injected dose per kilogram (%ID/kg) of each antibody, along with th e radiolocalization index (RI), was computed (RI = %ID/kg tumor . %ID/ kg normal tissue). Results. Tumor uptake of both antibodies (2.3 +/- 0 .53 %ID/kg) was significantly higher than that of normal tissues (0.56 +/- 0.12; P < 0.001), except for blood (2.8 +/- 0.83), resulting in a n RI greater than or equal to 3. There were no significant differences in uptake (%ID/g) between F(ab')(2) and IgG (F[ab'](2) = 2.0 +/-: 0.5 7; IgG = 2.6 +/- 0.94). The mean +/- SD of plasma T1/2 was slightly sh orter for F(ab')(2) (28.8 +/- 7.2 hours) than for IgG (45.9 +/- 16.7; P = 0.08). Conclusion. In short, the biodistribution and pharmacokinet ics of IMMU-4 F(ab')(2) were comparable to those of IMMU-4-IgG.