Db. Matchar et al., TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS FOR PERSONS WITH METASTATIC PROSTATE-CANCER - SURVIVAL VERSUS OUT-OF-POCKET COSTS, Urology, 49(2), 1997, pp. 218-224
Objectives. Treatment decisions for metastatic prostate cancer require
the consideration of factors such as survival, quality of life, costs
of care, and toxicities. In this study, we queried physicians who had
extensive experience with prostate cancer about features of metastati
c prostate cancer, patients' duality of life, and factors influencing
their decision to prescribe flutamide. Methods. Data were gathered thr
ough physician surveys and focus group discussions. Demographic inform
ation on the physicians and their patients was collected. Physicians m
ade assessments of five health states related to metastatic prostate c
ancer, based on the time trade-off technique,and on the desirability o
f flutamide, based on average expected improvement in survival free of
progressive disease, side effects, and drug cost. Results. Physicians
were internally consistent in their judgments of the factors most imp
ortant to duality of life for individuals with metastatic prostate can
cer. Physicians considered bone pain and weight loss/anorexia the most
important factors. Physicians who cared for a higher proportion of ol
der persons or Medicare recipients rated each scenario as less undesir
able than did physicians with a lower proportion of these patients. Ou
t-of-pocket cost was the major factor predicting whether a physician w
ould prescribe flutamide. Physicians working for health maintenance or
ganizations were more likely to prescribe flutamide but were more sens
itive to out-of-pocket costs than were other physicians. Conclusions.
Physicians varied in their perceptions of quality of life for persons
with metastatic prostate cancer and in their willingness to prescribe
flutamide. These perceptions and prescribing preferences are strongly
influenced by factors other than health status or specific health bene
fits. In deciding to prescribe flutamide, concerns over out-of-pocket
expenditures loom large for most clinicians. It would be important to
know the degree to which these concerns are shared by patients and whe
ther prescribing preferences differ for Medicare managed-care patients
who have pharmaceutical benefits. Copyright 1997 by Elsevier Science
Inc.