Cancer in the oldest old is a novel problem, due to the recent burgeon
ing of the population aged 85 and older. This article addresses three
critical questions related to cancer in the eldest old: Does the incid
ence of cancer increase after age 95? Is cancer a common cause of deat
h for the oldest old? Is cancer accurately diagnosed in the oldest old
? The authors analyzed a group of 507 autopsies of elderly divided in
three age groups, 75-90 years, 95-99, and over 99 (centenarians). The
prevalence of cancer was 35% among the younger persons and 20% and 16%
respectively for those aged 95-99 and for the centenarians. A fourth
of the patients in the younger group died from cancer but only 9.5% of
The people between 95 and 98 years and 7.1% of the centenarians died
from cancer. The cancer was the direct cause of death for 67% of the y
ounger persons and 41% of patients belonging to the two oldest groups.
The prevalence of metastases was 63% for tumors occurring in persons
aged 75-90, 32% in persons aged 95-98, and 29% in the centenarians. Ca
ncer had been accurately diagnosed prior to death in 67.4% of persons
aged 75-90, in 38.5% of those aged 95-99, and 29.4% of the centenarian
. Cancer as cause of death had been underestimated in 16% of the cases
in the younger persons and in almost 50% of cases of the oldest old.
This study suggests that the incidence of cancer and the importance of
cancer as a cause of death map decline after age 95 and that the clin
ical diagnoses underestimate significantly both the incidence of cance
r and the prevalence of cancer deaths in the oldest old.