Bgm. Jamieson et Hj. Grier, INFLUENCES OF PHYLOGENETIC POSITION AND FERTILIZATION BIOLOGY ON SPERMATOZOAL ULTRASTRUCTURE EXEMPLIFIED BY EXOCOETOID AND POECILIID FISH, Hydrobiologia, 271(1), 1993, pp. 11-25
In a cladistic analysis, poeciliids and zenarchopterids homoplasically
show elongation and flattening of the nucleus at right angles to the
plane of the central axonemal singlets; in both the tip of the nucleus
appears rounded in the plane of flattening but pointed in the plane a
t right angles. The two families differ in the distribution of mitocho
ndria in the elongate midpiece: circumferential in poeciliids but bila
teral in zenarchopterids. In poeciliid sperm and independently in Zena
rchopterus, the individual mitochondria are considerably more extensiv
e circumferentially than longitudinally; they differ in poeciliids in
being C-shaped. In Hemirhamphodon they are moderately elongate. In Der
mogenys and Nomorhamphus they have been modified monophyletically as a
pair of elongate mitochondrial derivatives. A wide cytoplasmic periax
onemal sheath (not seen in poeciliids) appears to have developed monop
hyletically in the ancestry of Hemirhamphodon, Dermogenys and Nomorham
phus with acquisition of radial rodlets only in Hemirhamphodon. A dist
inctive development in poeciliids is the submitochondrial net. Poecili
ids have greatly reduced the axonemal fins which are a synapomorphy of
the Actinopteri. Exocoetoids have retained well developed fins in Arr
hamphus, Dermogenys and Nomorhamphus but reduction has occurred in Zen
archopterus, in which the fins are small, and, apparently independentl
y, in Hemirhamphodon in which fins are absent. A posterior extension o
f the nucleus over the base of the axoneme is C-shaped and embraces al
most the entire circumference of the axoneme in poeciliids but, indepe
ndently developed, in zenarchopterids is a 'dorsal' plate. Its absence
in Hemirhamphodon is computed as a loss. These modifications relative
to the aquasperm condition are deduced to have been occasioned by the
adoption of internal fertilization. To what extent they are constrain
ed by features of the genome peculiar to poeciliids, zenarchopterids o
r atherinomorphs or are demanded by minute differences in fertilizatio
n biology, or by a combination of the two, is not at present determina
ble.