Study objectives: To assess the practicality and precision of a simple
desktop theophylline assay (Biotrack 516(TM)) in comparison to a stan
dard laboratory assay system (Abbott TDx(TM)). Design: A prospective b
linded paired sample study. Setting: The respiratory ward and outpatie
nt clinics, the pulmonary function and biochemistry laboratories of a
university teaching hospital. Patients: Sixty patients with asthma or
COPD attending the respiratory service. Measurements and results: Pair
ed specimens for theophylline assay were collected simultaneously for
analysis. There was a highly significant (p < 0.001) correlation betwe
en the two assay systems for both the total range studied (1.2-39.1 mu
g/mL; r=0.98), and the clinically important range of 5-15 mu g/mL (r=
0.95). The limits of agreement for the data by the Bland and Altman me
thod indicated a +/-2 mu g/mL range and a +/-2.7 mu g/mL limit for the
total range studied. Conclusion: The Biotrack 516 is an easy-to-use s
ystem, which provides rapid and reasonably precise measurements of ser
um theophylline levels. The device should be of particular value in sm
aller centers without an on-site laboratory assay system.