Background: Right ventricle (RV) preload assessment remains controvers
ial because the complexity of RV geometry is an obstacle to wall stres
s modeling. We developed a method to evaluate end-diastolic RV elastic
energy (EL), a variable that integrates all the stretching effects of
venous return and that can be easily estimated at the bedside from th
e area under the diastolic RV pressure-volume curve. The purpose of th
is study was to compare the clinical utility of EL and of the two conv
entional variables used to assess RV filling; ie, right atrial pressur
e (Pra) and RV end-diastolic volume (EDV). Method: We studied 26 posto
perative patients who required a rapid fluid challenge. Energetics wer
e evaluated by constructing the RV pressure-volume loop at the bedside
using right heart catheterization with RV ejection fraction (EF) deri
vation. Correlations between RV filling and RV performance (ejection a
nd mechanical efficiency) were studied. RV filling indexes were Pra, E
DV, and EL. Indexes of RV ejection were stroke volume (SV), RV stroke
work (RVSW), mechanical energy expenditure during ejection (EM), and t
otal energy expenditure of contraction (ET). Indexes of RV mechanical
efficiency were EF and the EM/ET ratio. Results: Three important resul
ts were obtained, First, among RT? ejection indexes, those that correl
ated best with RV filling indexes were ER;I and ET. Second, we found s
ignificant linear relationships between improved RV filling, as assess
ed by changes in EDV and EL, and improved RV ejection, as assessed by
changes in SV, RVSW, EM, or ET. Third, changes in EDV and EL also pred
icted improved mechanical efficiency, as assessed by changes in EF and
EM/ET. In all situations, changes in EL yielded the strongest correla
tions. Conclusions: Derivation of EL is simple and appears to be the b
est clinical means of assessing Starling's law of the heart for the RV
.