PREPARATION OF BETA-SUBSTITUTED TRYPTOPHAN DERIVATIVES - COMPARISON OF THE REACTIVITY OF N-METHYLINDOLE TOWARD AZIRIDINE-2-LACTONES AND AZIRIDINE-2-CARBOXYLIC ESTERS AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS USING MNDO CALCULATIONS
L. Dubois et al., PREPARATION OF BETA-SUBSTITUTED TRYPTOPHAN DERIVATIVES - COMPARISON OF THE REACTIVITY OF N-METHYLINDOLE TOWARD AZIRIDINE-2-LACTONES AND AZIRIDINE-2-CARBOXYLIC ESTERS AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS USING MNDO CALCULATIONS, Journal of organic chemistry, 59(2), 1994, pp. 434-441
With the aim of preparing novel beta-functionalized tryptophan derivat
ives, the reaction of (1S,4S,5R)- ethoxymethyl)-3-oxa-6-azabicyclo[3.1
.0]hexan-2-one (4), a newly developed rigid analogue of the synthetica
lly useful aziridine-2-carboxylic esters of type 1, with N-methylindol
e (6) was studied under acidic (Lewis acid) conditions. N-Methylindole
reacted exclusively at C-2 of 4 to give C-[3-(1-methylindolyl)]-5-O-m
ethyl-D-xylonolactone (7) in contrast to this nucleophile's known reac
tivity with aziridine-2-carboxylic esters 1 at C-3 under the same cond
itions. The desired beta-substituted tryptophan derivative 12 was inst
ead obtained by reacting 6 with the tert-butyldimethylsilyl furanoside
precursor of 4 (i.e., 9) followed by desilylation and oxidation of th
e anomeric hydroxyl function with TPAP. The regioselectivity of azirid
ine ring opening by 6 was rationalized by comparison of the LUMO coeff
icients and atomic charge distributions for the reactive centers of th
e aziridine-2-lactone 4, the aziridine-2-carboxylic ester 16, and the
aziridine furanoside 9 in both their ground states and protonated stat
es as determined using MNDO calculations. It was found that (1) proton
ation of both 4 and 16 causes a large increase in the LUMO coefficient
s at C-2 and C-3, thereby directing attack by N-methylindole (6), a so
ft nucleophile, toward these centers via orbital control, as has been
experimentally observed; (2) of C-2 and C-3, the higher LUMO coefficie
nt was found at the former position for the N-protonated forms of both
4 and 16, suggesting that C-2 is the preferred site of attack by 6 in
both cases. Though this was verified experimentally in the case of la
ctone 4, the fact that aziridine-2-carboxylic esters (e.g. 16) always
react with indoles at C-3 under acidic conditions indicates that in th
ese compounds, steric and/or electrostatic effects rather than orbital
considerations determine the course of the reaction; (3) in the case
of the N-protonated aziridino furanoside 9, C-3 was calculated to have
a higher LUMO coefficient than C-2, in accord with the exclusive atta
ck of 6 at the former position. MNDO calculations thus appear to be a
useful tool for the prediction of the reactivity patterns of rigid azi
ridine structures such as 4 and 9, but are less satisfactory in the ca
se of flexible aziridine-2-carboxylates in which other factors may pre
dominate.