LEXICAL INHIBITION AND ATTENTIONAL ALLOCATION DURING SPEECH-PERCEPTION - EVIDENCE FROM PHONEME MONITORING

Authors
Citation
Lh. Wurm et Ag. Samuel, LEXICAL INHIBITION AND ATTENTIONAL ALLOCATION DURING SPEECH-PERCEPTION - EVIDENCE FROM PHONEME MONITORING, Journal of memory and language, 36(2), 1997, pp. 165-187
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental","Language & Linguistics",Psychology
ISSN journal
0749596X
Volume
36
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
165 - 187
Database
ISI
SICI code
0749-596X(1997)36:2<165:LIAAAD>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
The TRACE model (McClelland & Elman, 1986) predicts lexically-driven i nhibition at the phonemic level. This is due to the combination of top -down excitatory connections from this lexical to the phonemic level, and inhibitory connections between competing units within the phonemic level. Frauenfelder, Segui, and Dijkstra (1990, Experiment 2) tested this prediction hi French and found no evidence of such inhibition. Ex periment I of the current study replicated their results with English stimuli: Instead of having longer reaction times (RTs), targets in Inh ibiting Nonwords (INWs) were detected just as fast as targets in contr ol nonwords. Our Experiment 2 improved the design of the original expe riment by adding a more appropriate: control condition, increasing the number of critical items, and employing balanced target locations and conditional target probabilities. Under these conditions, RTs to INWs were significantly faster than baseline RTs, an effect opposite in di rection to the hypothesized inhibition. Experiment 3 used a dual-task paradigm to examine the attentional demands of processing different ty pes of nonwords. In addition to performing the phoneme monitoring task as before, subjects also monitored a pure tone for frequency modulati ons. The RT advantage for INWs was replicated in this experiment for b oth phoneme and modulation targets. In Experiment 4 we replicated the: INW advantage for both phoneme and modulation targets, and found that the advantage disappeared for stimuli that carried both types of targ ets. The results suggest that both lexical inhibition and attentional allocation affect phoneme perception; their interaction can mask the e ffect of each. (C) 1997 Academic Press.