S. Vitale et al., INTERVAL BETWEEN ONSET OF MILD NONPROLIFERATIVE AND PROLIFERATIVE RETINOPATHY IN TYPE-I DIABETES, Archives of ophthalmology, 115(2), 1997, pp. 194-198
Objective: To describe the interval between first appearance of mild n
onproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and first appearance of ne
ovascularization (NV) in type I diabetes. Se Setting: A longitudinal s
tudy of 269 patients followed up annually. Participants: Participants
had insulin-dependent diabetes and were free of proliferative diabetic
retinopathy in both eyes at the baseline visit. Main Outcome Measure:
Stereoscopic color fundus photographs of each eye at each study visit
, graded for features of retinopathy. Results: Among the 305 eyes for
which the duration of diabetes at the first appearance of mild NPDR co
uld be determined, NV developed in 28 by the end of the study. Surviva
l analysis showed that the later the onset of mild NPDR was, the short
er the time from onset of mild NPDR to onset of NV (relative hazard fo
r each additional year to onset of mild NPDR, 1.22; 95% confidence int
erval, 1.10-1.35). Adjustment for systolic and diastolic blood pressur
e, proteinuria, and glycosylated hemoglobin (Hgb A(lc)) levels did not
change the relative hazard estimate for onset of mild NPDR. Higher le
vels of Hgb AI, were associated with a shorter time from onset of mild
NPDR to onset of NV (relative hazard, 1.26; 95% confidence interval,
1.05-1.51 [after adjusting for time at onset of mild NPDR]), as were h
igher levels of diastolic blood pressure, although not significantly (
relative hazard for 10-mm Hg increase in diastolic blood pressure, 1.5
2; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-2.83 [adjusting for onset of mild NPD
R, Hgb A(lc) level, systolic blood pressure, and proteinuria]). Neithe
r proteinuria nor systolic blood pressure had an effect on time from o
nset of mild NPDR to onset of NV, after adjustment for time at onset o
f mild NPDR, Hgb A(lc) level, and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion
: Later onset of mild NPDR is not necessarily associated with delayed
development of NV in patients with type I diabetes. Caution must there
fore be used in assessing the value of interventions that delay the on
set of mild NPDR without evidence of delayed onset of NV.