INTERVAL BETWEEN ONSET OF MILD NONPROLIFERATIVE AND PROLIFERATIVE RETINOPATHY IN TYPE-I DIABETES

Citation
S. Vitale et al., INTERVAL BETWEEN ONSET OF MILD NONPROLIFERATIVE AND PROLIFERATIVE RETINOPATHY IN TYPE-I DIABETES, Archives of ophthalmology, 115(2), 1997, pp. 194-198
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00039950
Volume
115
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
194 - 198
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9950(1997)115:2<194:IBOOMN>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Objective: To describe the interval between first appearance of mild n onproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and first appearance of ne ovascularization (NV) in type I diabetes. Se Setting: A longitudinal s tudy of 269 patients followed up annually. Participants: Participants had insulin-dependent diabetes and were free of proliferative diabetic retinopathy in both eyes at the baseline visit. Main Outcome Measure: Stereoscopic color fundus photographs of each eye at each study visit , graded for features of retinopathy. Results: Among the 305 eyes for which the duration of diabetes at the first appearance of mild NPDR co uld be determined, NV developed in 28 by the end of the study. Surviva l analysis showed that the later the onset of mild NPDR was, the short er the time from onset of mild NPDR to onset of NV (relative hazard fo r each additional year to onset of mild NPDR, 1.22; 95% confidence int erval, 1.10-1.35). Adjustment for systolic and diastolic blood pressur e, proteinuria, and glycosylated hemoglobin (Hgb A(lc)) levels did not change the relative hazard estimate for onset of mild NPDR. Higher le vels of Hgb AI, were associated with a shorter time from onset of mild NPDR to onset of NV (relative hazard, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.51 [after adjusting for time at onset of mild NPDR]), as were h igher levels of diastolic blood pressure, although not significantly ( relative hazard for 10-mm Hg increase in diastolic blood pressure, 1.5 2; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-2.83 [adjusting for onset of mild NPD R, Hgb A(lc) level, systolic blood pressure, and proteinuria]). Neithe r proteinuria nor systolic blood pressure had an effect on time from o nset of mild NPDR to onset of NV, after adjustment for time at onset o f mild NPDR, Hgb A(lc) level, and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion : Later onset of mild NPDR is not necessarily associated with delayed development of NV in patients with type I diabetes. Caution must there fore be used in assessing the value of interventions that delay the on set of mild NPDR without evidence of delayed onset of NV.