CD40 PREFERENTIALLY COSTIMULATES ACTIVATION OF CD4(-LYMPHOCYTES() T)

Citation
M. Cayabyab et al., CD40 PREFERENTIALLY COSTIMULATES ACTIVATION OF CD4(-LYMPHOCYTES() T), The Journal of immunology, 152(4), 1994, pp. 1523-1531
Citations number
75
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology
Journal title
The Journal of immunology
ISSN journal
00221767 → ACNP
Volume
152
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1523 - 1531
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-1767(1994)152:4<1523:CPCAOC>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
CD40 is a membrane differentiation antigen constitutively expressed on B cells that induces B cell growth and Ig synthesis after ligation wi th anti-CD40 mAb or with the recently identified CD40 ligand (CD40L). CD40L is rapidly induced on T cells after activation with anti-CD3 mAb or mitogens. While CD40-CD40L interactions are clearly beneficial to B cells, we speculated that a reciprocal costimulation of T cells migh t also occur. We have used genetic transfection to demonstrate that in teractions between human small, resting T cells and CD40(+) murine tra nsfectants substantially augmented anti-CD3 induced T cell proliferati on and resulted in the generation of CTL. T cell proliferation costimu lated by CD40 was IL-2 dependent. The ability of CD40(+) transfectants to costimulate T cell proliferation was specific in that VCAM-1(+), C D54(+), CD72(+), CD56(+), CD31(+), and fas(+) transfectants in the sam e host cells were inactive. CD4(+) T cells preferentially responded to CD40 costimulation, whereas CD8(+) T cells were substantially less re active. By contrast, costimulation with B7 transfectants induced equiv alent proliferation in the CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell subsets. in additi on, adult naive and memory T cells, as well as cord blood T cells, wer e responsive to CD40. These findings suggest that the CD40-CD40L costi mulation pathway may allow for selective expansion of CD4(+) T cells a fter interaction with CD40-bearing APC. The relatively restricted expr ession of CD40 on APC, as well as on medullary and cortical thymic epi thelium, indicates a possible role for this interaction in T cell diff erentiation and activation.