X. Li et Da. Gabriel, DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONTRAST-MEDIA IN THE INHIBITION OF PLATELET ACTIVATION BY SPECIFIC PLATELET AGONISTS, Academic radiology, 4(2), 1997, pp. 108-114
Rationale and Objectives. The authors evaluated the ability of three x
-ray contrast agents-a nonionic monomeric agent (iohexol), a nonionic
dimeric agent (iodixanol), and an ionic dimeric agent (ioxaglate)-to e
ither directly activate platelets or inhibit a platelet agonist from a
ctivating platelets. Methods. Fluorescence spectroscopy was used to de
tect the effect of contrast media on platelet activation. In this meth
od, the platelet is first exposed to a fluorescent probe, which is de-
esterified and trapped to Fluo-3 within the platelet. In the presence
of calcium, the fluorescence emission from Fluo-3 is increased 80-fold
. Thus, the increase in the free platelet calcium associated with plat
elet activation can be used to indicate platelet activation. Results.
None of the agents were shown to directly activate platelets. However,
wide differences in the ability of contrast media to inhibit platelet
activation by a specific agonist were observed. Activation of platele
ts by epinephrine or arachidonic acid was not affected by any of the t
hree contrast media studied. AU three agents partially inhibited colla
gen activation of platelets, with ioxaglate the more potent inhibitor.
Ioxaglate was the only agent to inhibit thrombin activation of platel
ets. Inhibition of adenosine diphosphate platelet activation was more
extensive with ioxaglate than with iodixanol; iohexol produced no inhi
bition at all. Conclusion. Direct activation of platelets by contrast
media was not observed. Of greater importance is the finding that ioni
c contrast media, but not nonionic contrast media, inhibit thrombin ac
tivation of platelets by binding to the anion-binding exosite I, thus
preventing thrombin from binding to and activating the platelet.