GYRODACTYLUS-RAFINESQUEII SP-N (MONOGENEA) FROM ETHEOSTOMA-RAFINESQUEI (PERCIDAE) IN KENTUCKY, WITH A REVIEW OF THE TAXONOMY AND HOST-SPECIFICITY OF SPECIES OF GYRODACTYLUS FROM ETHEOSTOMATID FISHES IN NORTH-AMERICA
Gk. Weddle et Dk. Cone, GYRODACTYLUS-RAFINESQUEII SP-N (MONOGENEA) FROM ETHEOSTOMA-RAFINESQUEI (PERCIDAE) IN KENTUCKY, WITH A REVIEW OF THE TAXONOMY AND HOST-SPECIFICITY OF SPECIES OF GYRODACTYLUS FROM ETHEOSTOMATID FISHES IN NORTH-AMERICA, Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 64(1), 1997, pp. 17-24
Gyrodactylus rafinesqueii sp. n. (Monogenea) is described from the tru
nk surfaces, fins, and gonopodium of the Kentucky snubnose darter (Eth
eostoma rafinesquei) from Russell Creek, Kentucky. The species has mod
erately sized hamuli (56-65 pm long), a ventral bar with prominent (14
-18 pm long) anterolateral processes and a tapered membrane, and a rel
atively large, slender marginal hook sickle (8.0-8.5 mu m long). An il
lustrated comparison of the sclerites of G. rafinesqueii sp. n. to tho
se of related species known from etheostomatid fishes (G. bretinae Wel
lborn, 1967; G. etheostomae Wellborn and Rogers, 1967; G. nigrum Roger
s, 1975; G. percinae Rogers and Wellborn, 1965) is presented. Gyrodact
ylus rafinesqueii sp. n. resembles most closely G. percinae but has la
rger marginal hook sickles and a dorsal bar devoid of a distinct media
l notch. Within various rivers studied in Kentucky, G. rafinesqueii sp
. n. parasitized E. rafinesquei, E. flavum, and E. simoterum, all thre
e of which are species of darters classified in the subgenus Nanostoma
/Ulocentra. Gyrodactylus rafinesqueii sp. n. did not parasitize specie
s of darter of other subgenera living syntopically in the same habitat
. In contrast, G. etheostomae parasitized hosts (E. barrenense, E. cae
ruleum, E. spectabile, and E. stigmaeum) of 3 subgenera and thus has a
much broader host specificity. Field collections revealed that G. raf
inesqueii sp. n. and G. etheostomae can co-occur within the same stret
ch of river but that they do not share hosts. Both apparently are depe
ndent on darters, for neither parasite was found on cyprinid fishes sa
mpled at the same sites. A key to species of Gyrodactylus from etheost
omatid fishes and preliminary thoughts on the evolutionary history of
gyrodactylids on these fishes are included.